Improving Return Loss Using Two 100 ohm Terminating Resistors

Improving Return Loss Using Two 100-Ohm Terminating Resistors

When terminating an RF transmission line, why might we use two 100 Ω resistors in parallel instead of a single 50 Ω resistor? Using two resistors can provide a better impedance match over a broader frequency range.

Single- and Dual-Resistor Termination Configurations

This improvement is related to the current distribution within a microstrip transmission line. The current density is highest near the edges of the microstrip conductor. Consequently, placing a 100 Ω resistor near each edge can provide a better broadband match than placing a single 50 Ω resistor at the center of the conductor.

This behavior is well documented and can be demonstrated through electromagnetic simulation and measurement.

The Sonnet model below represents a single 50 Ω resistor placed at the end of a 50 Ω microstrip transmission line.

Sonnet is primarily a 2.5-D electromagnetic simulator, but with additional modeling, it can be used to represent a three-dimensional resistor structure. The method-of-moments formulation places certain constraints on how current flowing in the z-direction is represented.

A 50 Ω microstrip transmission line is shown on the left side of the model. In the center is a three-dimensional representation of an 0402 resistor connected to two 15 mil × 15 mil ground vias. The substrate is Rogers RO3003 laminate with a relative permittivity of εr = 3.0.

The image below shows the two-dimensional view of the model in Sonnet Software.

Two-Dimensional Sonnet Model of the Single 50 Ω Termination

The three-dimensional rendering of the model is shown below. The model includes an alumina body, shown in blue. A resistive sheet, shown in orange, has a sheet resistance of 50 Ω/□ and is placed between the terminals, shown in pink, above the alumina body.

Three-Dimensional Model of the Single 50 Ω Termination

An electromagnetic simulation was performed from 0.1 GHz to 10 GHz. The plot below shows the magnitude of S11 in decibels.

Simulated S11 for the Single 50 Ω Termination

S11 remains below −20 dB at frequencies below approximately 2.6 GHz and reaches −15 dB at approximately 4.8 GHz. This performance is acceptable for many applications.

To improve the broadband match, two 100 Ω resistors can be connected in parallel, as shown in the Sonnet three-dimensional model below.

Three-Dimensional Model of Two 100 Ω Resistors in Parallel

The two-resistor termination produces a substantial improvement in the simulated impedance match.

Simulated S11 for the Two-Resistor Termination

With the two-resistor termination, S11 remains below −30 dB through approximately 9.5 GHz. This corresponds to a return loss greater than 30 dB over that frequency range.

The following current-density plots illustrate the current distribution at 2.4 GHz. Because the current density is highest near the edges of the microstrip conductor, placing a terminating resistor near each edge produces a better broadband match. In this example, two 100 Ω resistors are used in parallel instead of a single 50 Ω resistor.

Three-Dimensional Current-Density Plot at 2.4 GHz

Two-Dimensional Current-Density Plot at 2.4 GHz